Comments on: Albert Einstein: God vs Science

By: Marty_d

Marty_d — Sat, 12 May 2012 18:50:44 +0000

This story kind of hits the nail on the head for me. How is it that we humans have come to believe that our five senses are the only way to quantify the universe? Are we so arrogant as to think that there is nothing beyond our puny, limited way of observing things? Why is it so easy to dismiss the possibility of something simply because it is beyond our ability to comprehend or measure? By saying something “doesn’t exist” simply because we have no sensory perception of it says we are our own supreme beings, and that there is nothing greater. Given the state of the world today, I SERIOUSLY hope this is not the case.

By: Lol@religions

Lol@religions — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:44:21 +0000

Welp, the religous was illogical.

By: Lol

Lol — Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:32:02 +0000

Einstein was Jewish, maybe whoever made this up should of just done a quicky google search first.

By: Joel

Joel — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:52:14 +0000

The points of contention posted within this section are irrelevant. The article is merely giving a correlation between the subjective qualities of science and religion. Science is because we make it so. It cannot exist without us. We give life meaning.

By: jeff

jeff — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:20:04 +0000

Retoric like that doesn’t work on me. You can use scanners in todays society to view ones brain.
The cold issue can be measured when heat is subtracted from something it means it is colder than that something. For instance if you get an ice cube it subtracts heat from the body making you colder. when something adds heat to you it makes it hotter like the sun. darkness can be measured as well for instance too dark to see. or can barely see which means it can be measured by the absence of light particles. Evolution is the changes that occur in an organism that gets passed on to offspring and has been observed in single celled organisms called viruses. hence Hepititus a Hepititus b and Hepititus c. and is why immunity builds up in various strains and new medicines need to be developed.

By: laura

laura — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:56:22 +0000

Well…..I did like the story….. but I’m going to have to agree that you shouldn’t have put A.E. name on it even though there is no proof that he didn’t or did have this conversation…….I am going to agree with William.

By: Lily

Lily — Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:42:05 +0000

A nice little metaphor for the purpose it’s being used, but not nearly as effective when it’s punchline with albert einstein is completely false. Logic can also be twisted in whatever way possible to showcase a winning side. It’s a rather disconcerting to see all these commenters calling out and propagating stereotypes about both christians and atheists, though.

By: Einstein and God – wait, are we still doing this? | snakecharmer92

Einstein and God – wait, are we still doing this? | snakecharmer92 — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 03:14:18 +0000

[...] http://yes-23.com/other/albert-einstein-god-vs-science/ [...]

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:37:29 +0000

Cold is a concept. Concepts come about as the result of the human mind’s desire for simplification, especially for issues that cannot be conveniently addressed head-on.

We look as “cold” as something seperate from “hot” because it makes it easier to understand temperature.

Cold is simply our attempt at a simple (yet inadequate) explanation for something that requires too much effort to understand completely. Kind of like god.

By: Michael

Michael — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 02:37:24 +0000

I agree with WIlliam….+1