Comments on: Albert Einstein: God vs Science

By: FaLLEN

FaLLEN — Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:46:12 +0000

Only Man have the capability to prove Science but Man can never prove what is a Creator or God’s capable of. He who is wise only know one thing, and that is he do not know nothing.

By: Francisco Ortiz

Francisco Ortiz — Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:56:50 +0000

Alf the bible clearly states in the book of Genesis that “And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth: and it was so”(Genesis 1:11). Key words here “AFTER HIS KIND.” If you leave an engine in the Desert and you wait a million years, could it possibly change into a Ferrari? This is the foolish argument that scientists try to argue. Now it amazes me that you are a Christian and say that evolution can coexist with God. I invite you Mr. Alf or whoever has a question about God to send me a message @ francisco_ortiz1@yahoo.com

By: nadyx

nadyx — Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:39:07 +0000

Can you send me a link of the story without Albert’s name and picture? Very important.
Great Job you did, great!

By: The Lonely Observer Aeon

The Lonely Observer Aeon — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:47:24 +0000

This whole story i think is merely just comedic philosophy and being sarcastic to the fault of ones mistake but really… stupid as it is being “Right” and “Wrong” is based on the persons perception through being curious and the natural evidence of things being merely not to identify what was naturally there that is well… stupidity the unconventional use on an uncanny mind without also the mean of “common sense” is well pathetic… the theory of evolution the perception of only 1 man was to give evidence and show that we came from something called natural evolution 1 mans understanding is that we came from something close to a monkeys evolutionary gene pool or something close to that—that ive might forgotten—but as in the stupid or somewhat pathetic understanding of the society everything depends on somewhat whom has the majority of what right and what wrongs the means of being stupid is the idiotic perception of the majority of whats wrong and right from the society the whole concept of being absent on the sense that it is incomplete/canceled/in-process humanities point or the basic means of existence is well… nothing the whole point in being alive is just our common sense on the majority of acceptance being passed through by the society everything in this world is repeated an un-ending paradox well somewhat unending maybe is there is some logical error in this world [Space And Time-Infinite is always Expanding/Humanity and Existence is always limited] everything in this world has a reverse form and a original form and also a resonated form… what is right and what is wrong depends on what our perception lead us to. Iam Dean Lorenz Josh P. Eduarte born in october 14 1996 time isnt there but there is something muich bigger than the whole concept of time that isnt discovered yet—iam a tortured genius from a young age i pretend that iam stupid for the sense that i hated society iam a misanthropist and an atheist… if someone tells you that you are stupid well it just came out of one mans common perception not what is from you-the whole in living is well we would just or should reach something in our own unique lives that would make a point in all of what we did… we didnt exist as much not absence but just what we thought it was… and 2 last things after this topics Reality is Delusion/Delusion is Reality — Overture…Sunday November 20, 2011 at 8:46 PM philippines

By: jack

jack — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:43:36 +0000

Sorry, meant to say the end does not justify the means

thnx

Jack

By: jack

jack — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:42:45 +0000

My apologies, I meant to say that the end does not justify the means.

thnx

Jack

By: jack

jack — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:15:43 +0000

As an evangelical Christian I can say with confidence that lying is wrong and that the means does not justify the end.
Having said that, we can and must try to reach out with the “good news”.
The best way to do this is to tell the truth, pure and simple.
God has judged the world and found it lacking, to the point of sending His own Son to provide a fix for the problem.
So, we have a scenario where there is justice and mercy all in one act.
What could be logically wrong with that?
Now God is waiting for us to respond. He promises to meet us half way regarding the experiential.
We have a choice. And our choice becomes completely clear at the ultimate experience, death.
Finally, i think the choice is compelling….. that our soul is drawn to God.
The vast majority of people make the choice to ignore or worse to fight the very natural inclination to seek Him until they know Him conclusively.
My prayer is that you will follow your heart straight to a reality you can only avoid in this life.

By: Ben

Ben — Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:49:18 +0000

This is a nice story, but it’s flawed in some ways. Also, without the fake Einstein part, this wouldn’t even matter. The student’s view in the story is partially flawed, especially the evolution part. Unlike God and Jesus, evolution is observable. The fossils are evidence of that. There are countless humanoid fossils which are evolutionary links between us and primates.

More practically, how can you say that we haven’t evolved when we ourselves started as scavengers like any other species, and now dominate the Earth? I don’t think the brain of a simple scavenger and the brain of Earth’s dominant species are the same. Something must’ve evolved for us to continue advancing in technology to the point we are at today, and we will continue to evolve in order to keep advancing.

By: Ruckus

Ruckus — Sun, 30 Oct 2011 23:48:39 +0000

If you were fooled into reading this. Then you are no better than those who you think are fooled into believing in a creator. Science explores many evidential paths. However, it is explored by concepts we conjure in our minds (Scientific facts explaining mental process here). A concept is not evidential until it is conceptually found evident… I think it is more constructive to spend less time proving wrong in something you already don’t believe in than to have both considerations (topically human evidence vs God) on the mind as a mental note. Arrogance in either side serves no more of a purpose than to supersede that of which you are threatened by.

By: Dano

Dano — Tue, 20 Sep 2011 23:50:58 +0000

Knock out the Professor, the kids, and Albert …… it could have been Mickey Mouse!!!!!

It’s a great story, a great piece of reasoning into the an inkling of God ….. and oh, forget the spelling.

Great story!!!